Imagine if you woke up tomorrow morning and all 100 newsroom staffers of CNN Atlanta were gone, vanished like the rapture had come early? Pile on the global news network’s 37 bureaus, poof! Gone, never to be seen again.Add Anderson Cooper and all other CNN anchors with special shows. Again disappeared, no one knows where. How might your view of the world be affected? As Joni Mitchell so sweetly, but knowingly sang, “Don’t it always seem to go, you don’t know what you’ve got ’til it’s gone!”
And if we’re not careful we’ll be like the citizens who live in such countries as Iran, Turkey, Eritrea Burma or China who know what truth becomes when there isn’t a free and independent media and journalists keep getting jailed. These countries are the top offenders around the world, noted in the annual 2011 Prison Census, an accounting of all the journalist jailed throughout the world from the Committee to Protect Journalists.
According to the CPJ’s 2011 analysis 179 journalists have been jailed in the last year, what they say is a 15-year high.
The worst offenders are:
- Iran – 42 journalists jailed
- Eritrea – 28 journalists jailed
- China – 27 journalists jailed
- Burma – 12 journalists jailed
According to the study these journalists are often arrested but never charged, are taken to “secret prisons,” and are treated more as enemies to the totalitarian regimes than as professionals honing their craft.
They include journalists such as:Ne Min (aka Win Shwe) a freelance reporter for BBC who was sentenced to 14 years in prison for spreading false news and rumors to the BBC to fan further disturbances in the country” and “possession of documents including anti-government literature, which he planned to send to the BBC…
Nedim Sener – a Turkish columnist for the Turkish daily Posta, was imprisoned in March 2011 on charges he was aiding an anti-government group. But according to CPJ Şener, who wrote two book son the murder of fellow Turkish journalist Hrant Dink, feels he is being punished for looking into the Dink case.
There are many around the globe who complain about the media, who shout to the heavens about their in accuracy, corporate strings and alliances as well as their elitist and various political biases. But with the those who risk all to tell the truth, especially the 179 jailed journalists mentioned on CPJ’s list, the liberty of every one of us disappear.
The only security of all is in a free press. The force of public opinion cannot be resisted when permitted freely to be expressed. The agitation it produces must be submitted to. It is necessary, to keep the waters pure.” Thomas Jefferson, top author of the U.S. Declaration of Independence
The recent plaintiff award against self-described “investigative blogger,” Crystal Cox has stirred a hornets nest.
If you’re not up on the status of the blogsphere and the healthy (though unfounded) fear professional media organizations have of this group of new content producers then you’ve probably missed the hoopla.
Here’s a synopsis:
Crystal Cox began a series of blog posts about a Oregon finance company. In the post that seemed to have gotten her trouble, she called one of the company’s principals a thug, thief and a liar.
As Cox found out, those words became fighting words as the financial company promptly filed a civil suit against her in court, alleging defamation. Though the court case was a culmination of three years of repeated damaging postings against the Oregon firm.
The judge, though throwing out a bunch of blog posts, centered on the one highlighted above. Cox refused to name the source of her opinion about thuggery, thievery and lying as it related to Obsidian Finance and therefore she couldn’t prove she was innocent of defamation. As anyone who has taken a media law class knows, the only defense to such laws as libel and defamation is evidential truth.
Cox tried to use Oregon’s media shield law that protects journalists from divulging sources allowing their claim of truth to stand. As the fact that 40 different states each have their own shield laws, tells you – there is no federal constitution basis for such laws, rather they are created by states to ensure the free flow of information isn’t handicapped by the threat of punishment for those who reveal that information to reporters. The shield laws, shield journalists as defined by the state, from divulging sources – it does not protect them from litigation or judgements.
There are those who are seizing upon the judge’s assertion that she was not a journalist and therefore couldn’t use the Oregon’s shield law to protect her source. Endless comments have abounded from outrage that the judge overstepped his bounds to terror that freedom of speech was being impugned. (Read this Forbes piece about Cox trying to sell her PR services to the very firm she disparaged and you will find she’s no journalist…)
But the lesson in all of this is – when you write something negative as fact about a person you must be prepared to defend those statements. This goes for bloggers, journalists, local homeless man whoever, unless the statement is so outrageous that it could not be rationally determined as being true. See Larry Flynt. Journalists have no special protection when it comes to the law.
Shield laws protect journalists from sharing the source of their stories but they do not protect journalist for lying or gathering news by criminal means. If you don’t think so see the $10 million judgement against mainstream newspaper Cincinnati Enquirer for its 18-day investigative series about Chiquita Banana Industries. There’s little dispute that the story provided accurate information, just that the reporter obtained that information by criminal means. He was arrested and convicted and the Enquirer paid Chiquita and retracted the entire story before ever getting sued.
Journalist is not some invisible superpower cape that protects you from the law that ordinary citizens must follow. It didn’t matter whether Cox was labeled a journalist or a stay-at-home mom, both are afforded equal protections under the law, as is Kevin Padrick, the object of Cox’s venom.
Being a journalist doesn’t give you special rights that an ordinary citizen does not enjoy. In fact, our free press laws, are based upon the founding fathers’ support of free speech not of large newspapers.
Citizen journalists do not have to work for the New York Times to produce journalism. They only need training on such things as accurate and fair reporting, ethical source gathering, how to protect their sources and lawfully gaining information. As the Forbes article points out the judge’s decision indeed had a much broader definition of who is a journalist, rather than the narrow definition of who can use the media shield laws. The judge journalist definition:
Defendant fails to bring forth any evidence suggestive of her status as a journalist. For
example, there is no evidence of (1) any education in journalism; (2) any credentials or proof of
any affiliation with any recognized news entity; (3) proof of adherence to journalistic standards
such as editing, fact-checking, or disclosures of conflicts of interest; (4) keeping notes of
conversations and interviews conducted; (5) mutual understanding or agreement of
confidentiality between the defendant and his/her sources; (6) creation of an independent product
rather than assembling writings and postings of others; or (7) contacting “the other side” to get
both sides of a story. Without evidence of this nature, defendant is not “media.”
As the judge suggests – it takes journalism knowledge to produce journalism. You can’t use media laws to protect you when you do not adhere to media practices to produce your news.
At World Media Now we not only train citizens on how to write great stories but also how to gather those stories in a fair and ethical way that meets journalism standards. We teach them about media law – in their home country and the United States, and other ethical considerations to help them write stories that are balanced, accurate and fair but most of all true. No matter what country you live in the truth is a better defense than almost any other factor.
World Media Now is conducting a little market research. Thanks to our generous friends at SurveyGold we’ve been able to create a basic survey to glean how important global online news is important to the general public.
Please spread the world about the survey. You can take the survey here. Your help in passing this survey to your networks is greatly appreciated!
Go to the survey